Batch Data

  • Some of the nexus files don’t seem to read into R. Opening and saving the file in figtree solves this.

Data Sets

Labrid traits

–Carl Boettiger 00:52, 11 August 2010 (EDT) Note: labels on parameter bootstrap distributions have reversed wrasses and parrotfish. I’ve updated the software so that the plotting function takes care of the labeling automatically (when these were made it had to be added manually, while the automation of the data conversions and the painting by clade reversed the label assignments). See User:Carl Boettiger/Notebook/Comparative Phylogenetics/2010/08/10.

Gape distance (weighted by body mass)
Gape distance (weighted by body mass)
image
image

Gape distance (weighted by body mass)

Gape distance (weighted by body mass)
Gape distance (weighted by body mass)
image
image

Gape distance (weighted by body mass)

Protrusion distance weighted by body mass
Protrusion distance weighted by body mass
image
image

Protrusion distance weighted by body mass

Protrusion distance weighted by body mass
Protrusion distance weighted by body mass
image
image

Protrusion distance weighted by body mass

Body Mass
Body Mass
image
image

Body Mass

Body Mass
Body Mass
image
image

Body Mass

Jaw closing lever ratio
Jaw closing lever ratio
image
image

Jaw closing lever ratio

Jaw closing lever ratio
Jaw closing lever ratio
image
image

Jaw closing lever ratio

Jaw opening lever ratio
Jaw opening lever ratio
image
image

Jaw opening lever ratio

Jaw opening lever ratio
Jaw opening lever ratio
image
image

Jaw opening lever ratio

Jaw kinematic transmission
Jaw kinematic transmission
image
image

Jaw kinematic transmission

Jaw kinematic transmission
Jaw kinematic transmission
image
image

Jaw kinematic transmission

Based on nboot = 100

Various muscle mass traits do not seem to converge.

Carnivora Traits

Carnivore size by habitat: aquatic vs terrestrial
Carnivore size by habitat: aquatic vs terrestrial
image
image

Carnivore size by habitat: aquatic vs terrestrial

Carnivore size by habitat: aquatic vs terrestrial
Carnivore size by habitat: aquatic vs terrestrial
image
image

Carnivore size by habitat: aquatic vs terrestrial

No preference for any model. OU.1 fit has non-zero, though small alpha, which cannot be distinguished significantly from the Brownian motion model. No evidence for either of the regimes models. (Might compare ws2 to ou1 though)

Brownian motion:

sigma squared:
         [,1]
[1,] 3.922782
 
theta:
NULL
   loglik  deviance       aic     aic.c       sic       dof 
-317.3379  634.6758  638.6758  638.7225  645.7971    2.0000

OU.1:

alpha:
          [,1]
[1,] 0.2056982
 
sigma squared:
         [,1]
[1,] 4.099564
 
theta:
$size
 
9.39714 
 
   loglik  deviance       aic     aic.c       sic       dof 
-318.9566  637.9133  643.9133  644.0070  654.5953    3.0000


The coding of marine and freshwater separate, as well as a terrestrial regime does not converge under the wrightscape simplex method using the hansen initial conditions, but does just fine using the standard 1,1 initial conditions. Running now.

Mammalia

The huge mammalia data set takes a while even fitting the hansen model on the painting. bm loglik returns INF, ou1 returns loglik of -3727. the multiple regime model simplex routine fails to converge using the seed from ou2. Note the dramatic differences in the log body size optima found by the regime model. Certainly these differences must accomplish most of the difference in likelihood of this model.

alpha:
           [,1]
[1,] 0.01144819
 
sigma squared:
         [,1]
[1,] 6.277772
 
theta:
$size
       1062     aquatic terrestrial      volant 
   8.961080  254.067332    8.059478 -217.152860 
 
   loglik  deviance       aic     aic.c       sic       dof 
-3721.305  7442.610  7454.610  7454.634  7491.439     6.000